why do we wanna go tinkering with the last bit of unspoiled land in america?!?
this is about alaska...
listen up, speak up!
this is about alaska...
listen up, speak up!
just like that crazy, bushy-haired, bible-toting man i used to see at the park all the time…
recently carrie stood atop her soapbox and shouted to anyone who would listen about the arctic national wildlife refuge. more specifically about how the current u.s. administration wants to open up this pristine wilderness to oil and natural gas drilling. carrie kept urging me to check it out, so i did. i was really disturbed by the facts i uncovered. i think the reality hit especially hard because i had just returned the previous week from an unbelievable alaskan adventure. i witnessed land and experienced an environment unlike any i’d seen before. it made me contemplate the true meaning of words like ‘awesome’ and ‘amazing’. so i’m gonna lay out some facts. please read, digest and then take appropriate action. carrie and i think this is really important…
In 1960 19 million acres were set aside in northern alaska "for the purpose of preserving unique wildlife, wilderness and recreational values.” this area has become renowned as some of the most diverse and spectacular land in the world.
“The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (anwr) is a vast and beautiful wilderness, unique because it has a full range of arctic and sub-arctic ecosystems. Unique also because the systems are whole and undisturbed, functioning as they have for centuries, largely free of human control and manipulation.” [anwr brochure text]
Arctic National Wildlife Refuge 19.8 million acres
South Carolina 19.9 million acres
The Refuge includes an array of landscapes and wildlife habitats--from the boreal forest of the Porcupine River uplands . . . to the foothills and slopes of the Brooks Range . . . to the arctic tundra of the coastal plain . . . to the lagoons and barrier islands of the Beaufort Sea coast. these areas are home to an array of wildlife including dall sheep, muskoxen, shrews, hares, voles, lemmings, coyotes, wolves, foxes, lynx, bears, seals, walruses and whales.
these areas also contain hundreds of species of mosses, grasses, wildflowers, shrubs and other plants. “The ground lies permanently frozen below much of the Refuge. This impenetrable “permafrost” layer causes many areas to remain wet during the summer. Plants grow rapidly with 24-hour daylight, but the growing season is short. These factors make the Refuge a fragile area easily impacted by human activities. In this most northern of refuges, communities take a long time to recover from disturbances.” [anwr brochure text]
"disturbances" like the huge equipment, cranes, rigs, roads and people associated with drilling for oil and natural gas. because i believe there are such strong merits for the case against opening up anwr for drilling, i’m not going to rely on an emotional appeal. here are the facts, which scream for themselves.
there is currently a bill in congress which would allow for drilling in alaska’s wilderness…
H.R.5429
Title: To direct the Secretary of the Interior to establish and implement a competitive oil and gas leasing program that will result in an environmentally sound program for the exploration, development, and production of the oil and gas resources of the Coastal Plain of Alaska, and for other purposes.
Sponsor: Rep Pombo, Richard W. [CA-11] (introduced 5/19/2006)
Cosponsors (None)
[http://www.congress.gov]
does anyone else think it’s creepy that ‘and for other purposes’ was tacked on there?
although i don’t pretend to understand the games they play in congress, this is what i’ve gathered. this bill was bounced back and forth between the senate and the house many times. it faced several filibusters by environmentally minded opposition and as a result republicans sought to include a provision for drilling anwr in the 2006 budget reconciliation bill that will be considered this fall. i think the purpose of piggy backing it with a budget bill was to avoid another filibuster, thus circumventing normal senate deliberation rules. but this blog is not about partisan politics, it’s about a lopsided equation in which the damage and cost of an action would far outweigh its possible benefits.
so what kinda numbers are we talking about…
the administration proposes opening up a section along the delicate northern coastal plains of the reserve, which has been labeled the 1002 area.
The most recent government study of oil and natural gas prospects in ANWR was completed in 1998 by the U. S. Geological Survey (USGS). it found that there is an excellent chance (95%) that at least 11.6 billion barrels of oil are present on federal lands in the 1002 area. the USGS goes on to say that there is an excellent chance (95%) that 4.3 billion barrels or more are technically recoverable (costs not considered). the USGS guesses that at $24 per barrel [in 1996], there is a 95% chance that 2.0 billion barrels or more could be economically recovered and a 5% chance of 9.4 billion barrels or more.
americans consume 19.6 million barrels per day. [http://maps.unomaha.edu] statistically speaking, the chances are better that we’ll uncover 2 billion, as opposed to 9.4 billion, barrels of natural gas. let’s use a liberal number…say 5 billion barrels are recovered…that provides enough fuel to sustain america for 255 days or about 8.5 months. is my math wrong or is this just plain nuts?!?
here’s the part where you sit, scratching your head, wondering how the trade-off proposed in congress seems worth it.
i wrote to my senators and representative in congress to express my concerns. you should too. i received some responses, one of which came from senator jim demint. he politely asserted that we do “not see eye-to-eye on this particular matter.” and he went on to argue “that it is important for America to have an energy policy that plans and provides for the needs of today while looking to the challenges of the future.”
although i appreciate the senator’s response, i disagree with his tactics. doesn’t it appear that the money to be invested in drilling the arctic national wildlife refuge could be better used to study and implement plans for alternative fuel sources, such as biodiesel, fuel cells and hydrogen that would actually sustain us in the future? not only would this reduce our reliance on foreign oil, thus reducing the pressure on america to strictly police the middle east, it would also insure that america’s economic, domestic and international policies are not hijacked by our energy needs. it just makes sense. maybe i should run for congress…vote action jackson in 2008…
if you live in s.c.~~
click here to email senator jim demint
click here to email senator lindsay graham
if you live in the 29577 area~~
don’t forget to contact congressman harry brown too
you can find contact information for all senators and congressmen at
vote smart. represent!!
and if you’re feeling exceptionally fired up…why not pester some big oil companies? thanks to carrie for compiling all this info…
ExxonMobil CEO Rex Tillerson
Corporate Headquarters
5959 Las Colinas Boulevard
Irving, Texas 75039-2298
USA
(972) 444-1000
Mr. David O'Reilly
ChevronTexaco CEO
6001 Bollinger Canyon Rd
San Ramon, CA 94583
USA
(925) 842-1000
Mr. Jeroen van der Veer
Shell CEO
Royal Dutch Shell plc
Carel van Bylandtlaan 16
2596 HR DEN HAAG
Postbus 162
2501 AN DEN HAAG
Sir John Browne,
BP Amoco CEO
B.P. Amoco
Brittanic House
1 Finsbury Circus
London EC2M 7BA
Mr. James Mulva,
ConocoPhillips CEO
600 North Dairy Ashford (77079-1175)
P.O. Box 2197
Houston, TX 77252-2197
USA
Phone 281.293.1000
here, you can just plug your name and your comments into this…
Dear (enter name),
As you know, current legislation making its way through the United States Congress would open the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil drilling.
I am writing to urge your company to publicly pledge that you will not drill in ANWR.
The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge is a gift of pristine wilderness, first set aside by U.S. President Dwight Eisenhower more than 40 years ago. We as global citizens have a responsibility to preserve it. ANWR is home to more than 150 wildlife species, including caribou, polar bears, musk oxen, and millions of migratory birds.
The international community will not stand idly by and allow this wilderness area to be defiled.
If your company decides to drill in ANWR, we will launch a boycott of your products, and the products of your subsidiaries. And I know that millions will join us.
I urge you to make a public pledge that you will not drill in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge -- or face a boycott of your products.
Thank you for your consideration of this critically important matter.
Sincerely,
(your name)